Finding Yourself in Photography (by Marc Adamus)

Here I am writing for a blog.  Where does that word come from anyway….hmmmm… strange.  Right up there with ‘Google’, ‘Yahoo’….etc.  Who thinks up this stuff?  Four year-olds?   I don’t think of myself as a blogger… that’s the right word, isn’t it?  Still getting adjusted here.  In the last few years I’ve learned the likes of LOL, IMO, BTW and newspeak for photogs such as OOF and DOF.  I still have no idea what LAMO is, however.  Someone will tell me, and I might care….maybe.  You’d think I was 80 years old the way the age of wireless-everything, instant-or-else, multitask-till-you-drop has passed me by, but honestly, it all just seems so damn pointless to me.  I’ll be 30 here any day now and I’ve still never played video games.  Nope, if they hadn’t made me I’d have never gotten that first email account way back in 2004 either.  I get 150 of those f-ing things every day at this point, and people seem bothered when it takes me two days to get back to them…..if they’re one of the lucky ones, that is.

 

For all the technojunk I just don’t care to understand, and for all the odd ways it seems to make people behave, I’ve ultimately decided that one must invariably find a way to involve themselves in this so-called ‘information age’ in order to be moderately successful in almost any given field.  My field, is landscape photography.  I recognize that it’s probably my connection with nature that distances me from this mainstream society that seems to revolve around our own creations, but I’d like to keep it that way, thank you very much.  I have roots that I understand and if I left the wilderness behind my life would feel like part of some superficial construct.  My adventures in wilderness are the foundation of my life.  It is in the essence of these adventures, that I chose to try my hand at photography.  It is, however, in the essence of communicating my experiences in nature to the viewer of my photography that I choose to be an artist.

 

Chances are you haven’t seen a lot of photographs like mine, and that’s a good thing.  I want to tell you that the ability to develop a personal style that is both recognizable and evocative is one of the most important characteristics that any artist can possess.  I am eternally dissatisfied with the limitations of my camera when it comes to interpreting nature as I have come to know and appreciate it.  But that said, I can’t argue with the amazing ability this little piece of technology has (just when you thought I hated all technogizmos) to render the finite details I observed in a fraction of a second.  For that reason, I choose the camera as the tool I use to communicate my passion for nature and my adventures within its many realms.

 

Developing a personal style in photography is more limitless now than ever before.  The ways in which we can post-process a photograph and tailor it to our own vision of the scene we captured is a magnificent and wholly satisfying transformation of our art – one that had come to be unfortunately stereotyped as simple documentation.  I don’t understand how one could possibly be asked to conform to the simple limitations of the camera alone, when it is the evocation of our personal experience with the world we wish to share.  Obviously, not everyone sees things the same way, and there is no absolute definition of how, or what we saw to begin with.  To this point, I believe photography is about fusing the essential vision of the photographer with the landscape he or she is trying to render in a photograph.  A photograph should represent both the scene at hand, and the experience of being there.  This is where personal style is best realized and depicted. 

 

I would describe my personal style as bold, grandiose and epic with hints of mystery and darkness.  My work is usually very complex in composition but yet fluid, with many points of interest and a story to be told.  It is somewhat akin to a painterly interpretation of light but pushes the boundaries of traditional photography in the dynamic aspects of light control involved.  This style of imagery isn’t necessarily what I consciously choose, but simply what comes to me naturally as I explore all the possibilities nature has to offer.  The best art isn’t forced or premeditated – it comes from within.  It comes from experience, passion and a connection to your subject, whatever that is. 

 

Here are some examples of my photography and my thoughts.

 

 

 

 

Clouds streak over an ancient Bristlecone Corpse

Clouds streak over an ancient Bristlecone Corpse

 

Changing seasons in Oregon's Columbia Gorge

Changing seasons in Oregon's Columbia Gorge

 

Grand views in Glacier Park at twilight.

Grand views in Glacier Park at twilight.

 

Lenticular cloud formation over Oregon's Alvord Desert.

Lenticular cloud formation over Oregon's Alvord Desert.

 

Long exposure at twilight on Washington's Olympic Coast.

Long exposure at twilight on Washington's Olympic Coast.

 

 

 

 

 

~ by mountaintrailphoto on January 31, 2009.

35 Responses to “Finding Yourself in Photography (by Marc Adamus)”

  1. Great post Marc! Thanks for joining out team blog. Now if I could just get the rest of the team to start blogging . . .

    Ian

  2. I start seeing your work since shutterpoint and now on smugmug. I always wish that you have a blog that we can get update about your photography stuff and recent work. Having you posting in this blog is already got me excited. Looking forward for your new post. Cheers!

  3. If you’re not careful, ten years from now you might find yourself a 40-year old who never played video games, can’t keep up with email, lives on 4 hours of sleep a night and still tries to produce the best damn images he can despite juggling a slew of other responsibilities. Oh wait, that’s me…

    One thing we can both look forward to is, however many years from now, when it’s time to go, well be able to look back and know we worked out butts off to make every minute count and we wouldn’t have it any other way.

    Guy

  4. Marc, congrats on your first blog post, I love it.

  5. alrighty then.

  6. Just like other places I’ve seen you post, Marc, your an ego maniac. That will do nothing for your future in photography, unique style or not.

  7. Please! Can’t we all just get along? We value your opinions and encourage full and frank discussions on this blog, but I ask folks to keep things focused on the photography itself, and not on the sizes of the respective egos of various Team members. Because let’s face it, the Team has enough collective hot air to fill the Goodyear blimp!

    -Ian

  8. “and for all the odd ways it seems to make people behave”…..just shaking my head over here. Here I try to post a humourous, tounge-in-cheek piece that ties into a useful discussion about the development of one’s style and Jim comes out of left field with this. Wow. Just amazing. Where do I go wrong.
    Maybe my next post will be about all the mistakes I make in the field, all the idiot things I’ve done, (like running over my camera that once) and all the pictures I’ve missed or totally butchered.

  9. Marc, something that differentiates your work of so many others is the ability to capture a mood. An awareness of light adds so many layers to your images. It’s great to see someone so young with such a great eye and ability to capture the moment.

    Dan Jurak.

    http://www.danjurak.com

  10. Nice work! I look forward to more of these posts.

  11. Love the ‘Ethereal’ gallery on your website, Dan.

    Best,

    - Marc

  12. Jim, it’s easy to make such a judgment if all you see is Marc’s larger than life images. Let me tell you from having had the pleasure of meeting him in person that the one thing he is definitely not is an egomaniac. He’s as humble and sensitive in person as anyone you’ll ever meet. He really does work harder than just about anyone to experience and capture these moments and deserves to be proud of his achievements. Very few people take their work as seriously and put as much effort into it. That’s not ego, that’s honest to goodness passion. If only more people had it.

    Guy

  13. Marc,

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts and your images. Do not change a thing or stop what you are doing….

    Richard

  14. wow – someone is jealous. (Jim) Sheeze-Louise!

    Great post, Marc. Extremely well said on all points. Keep up all the great work!

  15. In all honesty Marc…I personally would love to hear the tale about running over your own camera.

  16. SO, I was camped out in the Buttermilk hills above Bishop a few years back. I woke up in the before dawn, fixed some coffee and pulled out of a small 4×4 road. I drove about 10 miles downhill and prepared to make a short hike out to where I would try to catch the sunrise. The atmosphere this morning was incredible, and the sunrise promised to be the best I’d seen all two weeks of the trip. When I got out and looked for my small camera pack (2 lenses and a 5D body) I couldn’t find it anywhere! This was the worst timing possible, twenty minutes before sunrise! I jumped back in the car and raced back to my camp spot as fast as possible, where I found my back dirtied on the ground. Not wasting a single second at this point, I grabbed it and rushed back to my sunrise shoot. I flew out of the car and ran over to shoot the sunrise. When I took out my 5D with the 17-40 attached, I realized it was broken right off the body!

    The mistake I made was leaving in the dark and not realizing my camera pack had made it out of the vehicle and under the tire! I had been rearranging gear the night before. I didn’t notice running it over because of the rocks and rugged nature of the road in general, but in hindsight, I did recall a particularly large bump on my way out. It was insult to injury that I missed one of the best sunrises of the year. Thankfully, no other lenses were damaged (I only lost a polarizer) but this was the type of area that really lent itself to wide angles, and I only had a 70-200 on me at the time.

    When I further inspected things after the morning shoot, I discovered no serious damage to the body itself. I was pretty impressed at the durability of this camera. Unfortunately, I did have an extra body with me but no extra 17-40, and I was only two weeks into a trip that turned out to be five. I spent the whole rest of the day and into the night driving to Las Vegas to purchase a replacement lens and polarizer.

  17. Great post, Marc. Your passion and purpose come through, just like with your photographs. Inspirational as well.

    – Greg

  18. Great article, your passion for photography is evident not only in the text your write but also your images.

  19. great posts marc, i wholly share your passion for photography.
    just wish i could live in the part of the country that you do.
    just the mention of the buttermilk hills and bishop leave me
    longing to go back there. keep up the great work that you do.
    hope to make one of your workshops at some point.

    larry

  20. The etymology of the word “blog” is that it is derived from the two words, “web log” i.e. a log maintained on the World Wide Web. Someone with lazy pronunciation must have run the “b” from the end of the word “web” on to the front of the “l” in the word “log” and made up the word “blog” as a result.

  21. Hi Marc.

    I`m a huge fan of your work and find your signature unique, both dramatic and stunningly beautiful all at once.
    Thanks for sharing thoughts here, hope you`ll keep posting your latest news.

    I`ll be watching you…muahaha.

    Regards
    Seung Kye

    http://www.leeseungkye.com

    PS! I would love if you took a look at my gallery and tell me what you think.

  22. …and for the rest of Mountain Trail Team; great to see your blog here and get latest news on all your members.
    This really creates a better connection to your viewers than only having a website.
    Thanks for inspiration!

    Regards
    Seung Kye

    http://www.leeseungkye.com

  23. Marc your work is something else. Just when I thought I was getting a handle on this gig I was told about your site. Your images make me want to work harder. I look at it as a challenge to step up and improve my own photography. Thanks for showing us how good it can get. Cheers

  24. p.s. good to see the tall poppy syndrome is alive and well not only in Australia. Jim needs to realize you have earned the right to be confident, your images are some of the best on the planet. I would like to see what he has to offer.

  25. The blog post above by Marc Adamus is one of the biggest and most arrogant piles of crap I’ve ever read. There’s nothing more to his photos than a TON of post processing and image manipulation, and there’s nothing unique about them either, as I’ve seen similar images many times and for years before Marc Adamus ever picked up a camera.

    Some people sure are easily fooled. There’s a sucker born every minute.

  26. Hey Marc,

    I’m glad I’m not the only photog that runs over their camera equipment! The good thing for me is I had it in my Mountainsmith Parallax Camera Pack and not the LowePro! I only damaged a couple of filter rings on my TS-E 24 & 90mm lenses. Keep up the great work and keep shooting!

    As for the negative posts from Jim and Mr. Natural, is life that boring for you guys? Oh, and please use your real name when posting to this blog. If you have something to say whether good or bad, please have the guts to post your identity.

    -Jerry D. Greer

  27. Get a life people! Get out there and start making your own photographs and stop criticizing everyone elses. And by the way, it seems if you might have some balls and post your names if you are going to go so far as creating consiracy websites and such. Joe

  28. This blog is not to be used as a place for slander and pointless negativity. I am temporarily suspending comments pending further notice. I’m all for the open and honest exchange of ideas, but I didn’t start this blog so that it could become a place for launching ad hominem attacks. If you don’t like a photo you see here, feel free to say so, but if you can’t do it in a polite manner, then please go elsewhere.

    - Ian Plant

  29. Marc you’re my favourite landscape photographer and your work is truely inspiring. My only complaint is that you haven’t posted any new shots on your web site recently! And I’m a bit disappointed that you’re a luddite, but as long as you continue to take breathtaking photos I’ll let you off :)

  30. I dont understand the attack on Marc… He’s got great talent and full of passion and ambition. I am fully against any type of “sucking up” but you have to be a moron to not appreciate Marc’s work. He’s doing a damn good job of marketing himself and there’s nothing wrong with that. I wish I had the stomach to peddle my work like he does but it would ultimately take away from my enjoyment of photography. Marketing is harder than creating the works and I’ve got to give him props there as well!

  31. I couldn’t agree more, Rick.. being not only your friend, but also personally shooting with Marc. We’ve even met on the trail a few times and shared some conversation. His talent is amazing, and his work has and continues to inspire me. I don’t know that he does too much work in the Gorge any more, which is my favorite subject matter – but his past work is nothing short of amazing, and always pushes me to improve my own art.

  32. To marcadamuslies blog dude:
    Since you are too chicken to divulge your name, I will address you here:
    I fully agree that art is subjective, I’ve stated that myself for many years. And my comments were directed at how the images make you feel when you look at them. I’ve not ever encountered anybody (civilian – non photographer) that saw his work and didnt like what they saw.
    There’s a small percentage of photographers who have the whole ambition to chase the shot, eye for composition, and skill to determine the right level of processing for each scene.
    I’ve got a challenge for you…I dare you to be open minded! Forget all the words that accompany his work and how the images were created, and tell us what you think in regards to how they look. Can you be unbiased against the intent of your blog/attack and state what you think about the images themselves?

  33. Believe it or not, we are not responsible for posting that “MarcAdamusLIES” comment on this blog. Someone else did that. We’re not complaining, but the record should be set straight.

    Now Rick, if you want to know what we think about Marc’s images, here goes:

    They are far too Photoshopped to make up for a lack of skill in the field, they are formula-created images (shoot at widest angle, possible, add stupid soft-glow effects, etc), and they enjoy undeserved fanfare from rabid fans such as yourself.

    As for what we think about Marc, everyone knows where to go to read that.

    Yes, they are nice images, but nothing else. Certainly not deserving of the outlandish comments they’ve received over the years.

    Jane Wilcox

  34. I don’t think you’re a “moron” if you don’t like Marc’s work, but i do think you are seriously ignorant (and some of you are truly mentally ill) if you think that the results are all the work of Photoshop. A good body of film work is much more heavily ‘manipulated’ than his photos, albeit in a different way. Some people need to put up or shut up, others need to get out more. Most of us sane folks just appreciate the great photography that passionate artists like Marc offer us.

  35. Well said Stan. We have this same debate in Australia only not so hateful. Appreciate it for what it is, something beautiful to look at. We had a photographer here win an award at our recent national awards the APPA’s with a photo taken with an iphone. How does that make you feel. Get over it and create images with everything available. Why does photography have to be pure in all forms. It is image making after all, not a recipe you can’t change.

Leave a Reply